The UCAT is not a knowledge test. It is a test of speed and reasoning under pressure, and both are trainable. Here is a practical, free method for each of the four subtests, the mistakes that cost the most marks, and a six-week routine.
There is nothing to memorise for the UCAT. Every question is designed to be answerable from the information in front of you, which means the exam is really measuring how fast and how accurately you can think when the clock is running. That is good news: with the right method and enough timed reps, speed and accuracy both improve. This guide walks through that method subtest by subtest, and it is built to be used alongside my free UCAT practice tool so you can apply each idea the moment you read it.
Original UCAT-style questions across Verbal Reasoning, Decision Making, Quantitative Reasoning and Situational Judgement, with a breakdown by question type so you can see where you are leaking marks.
The UCAT ANZ is a roughly two-hour, computer-based admissions test used by most undergraduate medicine and dentistry programs in Australia and New Zealand. Since 2025 it has had four subtests (Abstract Reasoning was removed):
The three cognitive subtests are each scaled from 300 to 900, giving a total between 900 and 2700. Situational Judgement is reported separately in bands 1 to 4. Different universities weight all of this very differently, so always check how your target schools use the score.
The most common way to waste UCAT prep is to drill under time pressure before your reasoning is sound, which just bakes in fast mistakes. Do it the other way around. For the first couple of weeks, work untimed and focus entirely on getting questions right and understanding why. Once your untimed accuracy is high, add the clock and push your pace until the accuracy holds. The exam is ultimately won on speed, but speed without accuracy scores nothing.
Stop reading every word. The passages are long on purpose and you do not have time to absorb them fully. Skim for structure, then go to the question and scan back for the specific keyword or claim it is testing. On true / false / can't tell items, remember that "can't tell" has a precise meaning: the passage gives no basis to decide either way. It does not mean the statement merely feels uncertain to you, and it does not mean the statement is false. Practise separating "the passage does not say" from "the passage says this is wrong", because the test leans on that distinction constantly.
Get the problem out of your head and onto the noteboard. Most Decision Making errors are working-memory errors, not reasoning errors: people try to hold a syllogism or a probability in their head and slip. Sketch it. Learn the handful of recurring forms, basic probability, simple Venn logic, ordering puzzles, and interpreting a table or a strong-versus-weak argument, so you recognise each on sight and apply a known approach rather than improvising.
The maths is school level; the speed is not. Build mental arithmetic and estimation until the slow on-screen calculator becomes a last resort rather than a reflex. Most questions can be narrowed or solved by estimating and checking the order of magnitude. Drill the everyday operations that recur, percentage change, ratios, rates, and unit conversions, until they are automatic, and always sanity-check whether your answer is even plausible before committing.
People will tell you Situational Judgement cannot be prepared for. They are wrong. It rewards a consistent set of principles: patient safety first, honesty and integrity, acting within your competence, and avoiding extreme actions. Read the exact wording, because "how appropriate is this action" and "how important is this consideration" are different questions that need different reasoning. Practising real items and checking your answers against those principles reliably moves your band.
Sinking three minutes into one hard question when every item is worth the same single mark, flag it, guess, and move on. Over-reading Verbal Reasoning passages instead of hunting for the claim being tested. Practising untimed forever and never building speed. And writing off Situational Judgement as unstudiable, which quietly costs a whole band.
Four. Since 2025, Abstract Reasoning has been removed, leaving Verbal Reasoning, Decision Making, Quantitative Reasoning and Situational Judgement.
The three cognitive subtests are each scaled from 300 to 900, giving a total between 900 and 2700. Situational Judgement is reported separately in bands 1 to 4.
If it is timed, varied and reviewed properly, yes. The method matters far more than how much you pay for questions. Use the free tool to drill the skills, and add commercial mocks later only if you want more full-length simulation.